Trump Administration Bird Rule on the Chopping Block
Posted in Migratory Bird
Trump Administration Bird Rule on the Chopping Block

On May 7, 2021, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), as many anticipated, published a proposed rule to revoke a Trump Administration rule impacting the scope of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA).  The Trump Administration rule was finalized on January 7, 2021 and became effective March 8, 2021.  It clarified that the MBTA’s prohibition against the take of migratory birds did not extend to death or injury of migratory birds that results from, but is not the purpose of, an action (also known as incidental take).  Prior to the Trump Administration Rule, USFWS had, for decades, taken the position that the MBTA’s take prohibition does extend to incidental take.  The USFWS’s longstanding position has been both upheld and rejected across the various federal appellate courts.  If the USFWS finalizes its revocation of the Trump Administration rule, incidental take of the 1000+ migratory birds protected by the MBTA could once again be subject to criminal penalties based on judicial precedent.  Since no permitting program to authorize incidental take exists under the MBTA, activities resulting in incidental take will be at the mercy of USFWS’ enforcement discretion to avoid criminal liability under the MBTA.   

The publication of the proposed rule announces a 30-day comment period, which will close June 7, 2021.  The USFWS seeks comment specifically on the following: (1) Whether the USFWS should revoke the rule, as proposed, and why or why not; (2) The costs or benefits of revoking the rule; (3) The costs or benefits of leaving the rule in place; and, (4) Any reliance interests that might be affected by revoking the rule, or not revoking the rule. 

  • Brooke M. Marcus
    Partner

    Brooke Marcus is a natural resources lawyer focused on assisting the renewable energy sector with maintaining compliance with environmental laws. She is go-to counsel for matters involving the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the ...

Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.

Stay Connected

RSS RSS Feed

Categories

Archives

View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

Nossaman LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek