U.S. Supreme Court Denies U.S. Forest Service’s Petition for Review in Canadian Lynx Case
Posted in Court Decisions

On October 11, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the U.S. Forest Service’s (Forest Service) petition for writ of certiorari to review the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit's decision in Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Forest Service, 789 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2015).  The key issues in the case related to standing, the justiciability of programmatic planning documents, and whether section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) may require a federal agency to reinitiate consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) even after the agency has taken a final agency planning action.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to decline review leaves in place the Ninth Circuit’s holdings that:  (1) Article III standing to challenge a procedural violation with regard to an agency planning decision does not require demonstration of imminent injury from a specific development project; (2) an agency’s procedural failure to undertake section 7 consultation for a planning decision is ripe for judicial review; and (3) the obligation to consult with the USFWS under section 7 continues in effect even after the federal agency has taken final agency action on a plan or program and there is ongoing discretionary federal involvement or control over the listed species.

The dispute in Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Forest Service concerned the Forest Service’s decision not to reinitiate section 7 consultation for an adopted land management and conservation and recovery plan for the threatened Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) after the USFWS designated National Forest land in the Northern Rocky Mountains as Canada lynx critical habitat.

On the same day, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a case involving critical habitat for the green sturgeon, Bldg. Indus. Ass'n of the Bay Area v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 792 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2015), as well as a federal court ruling upholding the Forest Service's 2012 Colorado roadless rule, Ark Initiative v. Tidwell, 816 F.3d 119 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Twitter/X Facebook LinkedIn
  • Liz  Klebaner

    Liz Klebaner advises private and public agency clients on a variety of complex land use and environmental matters, including California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Policy Act, California Coastal Act ...

Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.

Stay Connected




View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

We use cookies on this website to improve functionality, enhance performance, analyze website traffic and to enable social media features. To learn more, please see our Privacy Policy and our Terms & Conditions for additional detail.