On July 27, 2022, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) seeking comment on species conservation banking. Species conservation banking gives developers and other entities the opportunity to mitigate potential harm to wildlife by allowing them to purchase habitat or species credits from bank owners. The ANPR is a result of a provision in the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that required the Service to issue regulations for species conservation banking programs. Although the ANPR stems from the NDAA, conservation banking regulations are expected to apply beyond the Department of Defense.
The Service states in its ANPR that “conservation banks contribute to the recovery of listed species and help reduce threats such as habitat fragmentation and lack of habitat connectivity by consolidating and managing priority habitat areas in a reserve network.” Thus far, 173 Service-approved conservation banks have covered about 260,000 acres of habitat for 57 endangered or threatened species. The Service makes sure to note that the proposed rule will be compatible with the rule governing wetland mitigation banks, Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (73 Fed. Reg. 19,594 (April 10, 2008)) (2008 Rule).
Specifically, the Service seeks comment on:
- The level of detail necessary to ensure standards are applied consistently to all forms of compensatory mitigation, including equivalence in covering the costs of mitigation on public and private lands.
- The level of detail necessary when addressing durability and additionality standards to ensure consistency across mitigation mechanisms and provide species conservation.
- How the proposed rule should incorporate monitoring, financial assurances, and publicly accessible mitigation data tracking systems to ensure a compensatory mitigation mechanism is meeting its performance standards.
- The challenges to species bank establishment within the Service’s authority.
- How the proposed rule should align with the 2008 Rule so that wetlands mitigation banks and species banks remain compatible.
- How the Service should address potential bank projects on lands with unique ownership and protection considerations, such as Federal or Tribal lands.
The ANPR states comments are due September 26, 2022, and provides additional information regarding the submission of comments.
Sara Greenberg assists in advising clients on environmental and land use matters involving the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the ...Full Bio | All Posts | Email | 202.887.1405
Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.
Stay ConnectedRSS Feed
- Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
- Climate Change
- Construction Projects
- Continuing Education
- Court Decisions
- Critical Habitat
- Endangered Species Act
- Fish & Wildlife Service
- Freedom of Information Act
- Government Administration
- Migratory Bird
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- Pacific Northwest
- Regulatory Reform
- Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
- Speaking Engagements
- Supreme Court
- Water Issues