Settlement Agreement Requires Grizzly Bear Status Review
Settlement Agreement Requires Grizzly Bear Status Review

The U.S. District Court for the District of Montana has approved a partial settlement between the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) requiring that the Service complete and post a status review of the lower-48 grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) populations no later than March 31, 2021.  Earlier this year, CBD filed a lawsuit challenging the Service’s alleged failure to update a 1993 federal recovery plan for the species.  The partial settlement disposes of CBD’s first claim for relief, which alleged that the Service had failed to conduct a five-year status review of grizzly bear populations in the lower-48 states pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

Grizzly bears in the lower-48 states were listed as threatened under the ESA in 1975.  A 2011 status review concluded that the existing 1993 recovery plan for the species no longer reflected the best available science and needed to be updated to consider additional recovery areas, but such action had not been taken, prompting CBD to bring its lawsuit.  As part of that lawsuit, CBD claimed that the Service failed to comply with the ESA’s requirement to prepare a status review for listed species once every five years because one had not been prepared since 2011.

The court will still need to resolve CBD’s remaining claims, including whether the Service is required to prepare an updated recovery plan that reflects current science and whether the Service must consider additional potential grizzly bear habitat as part of that plan.

  • David J. Miller
    Counsel

    David Miller assists clients on a variety of complex land use and environment related matters, including matters dealing with the National Environmental Policy Act, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, and the ...

Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.

Stay Connected

RSS RSS Feed

Categories

Archives

View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

Nossaman LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek