Ninth Circuit Rules Injury from Future Water Rights Restrictions Too Speculative for Article III Standing
Posted in Court Decisions

On February 21, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District (collectively, Water Contractors) lacked Article III standing to pursue an Endangered Species Act (ESA) claim against the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (collectively, the Federal Defendants) in connection with the Federal Defendants’ water flow augmentation for the Lewiston Dam.  San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Haugrud, Case Nos. 14-17493, 14-17506, 14-17515, and 14-17539.

The Water Contractors alleged that the Federal Defendants failed to conduct formal consultation under ESA section 7 for their 2013 release of Trinity River water from the Lewiston Dam in an amount that exceeded the designated applicable water release schedule for the dam, thereby causing economic injury to the Water Contractors and their members.  In particular, the Water Contractors alleged that the Federal Defendants’ action would cause the imposition of more stringent regulations on the operations of the Central Valley Project, restricting water deliveries to their members and adversely impacting the agricultural industry, in the event that the reduction of cold water storage resulted in insufficient flows and adversely impacted winter run and spring run salmon egg incubation.

The Court declined to find that the Water Contractors had standing to pursue their ESA claim, holding that the alleged injuries were speculative and not traceable to the Federal Defendants.

The Court did not reach the question of whether economic injury is an interest that is protected under ESA section 7.

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
  • Partner

    Liz Klebaner advises public agency and corporate clients on a variety of complex land use and environmental matters, and she litigates in both state and federal court.  While based in Nossaman’s Los Angeles office, Liz has strong ...

Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.

Stay Connected

RSS RSS Feed

Categories

Archives

View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

We use cookies on this website to improve functionality, enhance performance, analyze website traffic and to enable social media features.  To learn more, please see our Privacy Policy and our Terms & Conditions for additional detail.