Federal Court Orders Re-do of Golden-Cheeked Warbler Petition Review
Federal Court Orders Re-do of Golden-Cheeked Warbler Petition Review

On September 5, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas held in General Land Office v. U.S. Department of the Interior, that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) improperly denied a petition to delist the federally-endangered golden-cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) (GCWA) by holding the petition to an unlawfully heightened standard at the initial, 90-day finding stage. As a result of the court’s ruling, the Service is required to undertake a review of the GCWA delisting petition and make a 90-day finding as to whether the petition presents substantial information indicating that delisting may be warranted. If the Service finds in the affirmative, the agency must then make a 12-month finding as to whether delisting is warranted.

This is the second time the Service has been sued over its denial of the same GCWA delisting petition. In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit similarly remanded a previous negative 90-day finding to the Service, requiring the agency to undertake a fresh review and issue a new 90-day finding. That new 90-day finding was the subject of General Land Office v. U.S. Department of the Interior. Pursuant to the court’s order, the Service must now issue a new 90-day finding based on the appropriate standard (rather than the heightened standard the agency previously has applied).

  • Rebecca Hays Barho
    Partner

    Rebecca Hays Barho focuses her practice on natural resource law, with particular emphasis on the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), the Clean Water Act ...

Nossaman’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog focuses on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States. Topics include listing and critical habitat decisions, conservation and recovery planning, inter-agency consultation, and related developments in law, policy, and science. We also inform readers about regulatory and legislative developments, as well as key court decisions.

Stay Connected

RSS RSS Feed

Categories

Archives

View All Nossaman Blogs
Jump to Page

Nossaman LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek